
I had planned to reactivate this blog shortly with a series of further posts about the latest stack of Voodoo-related vinyl that I brought back from the US last month. Obviously under the circumstances, that's not going to happen for some time.
I don't know how to begin writing about the devastation in Haiti. When I close my eyes I see the images of unimaginable death and destruction from the past week projected like a horrific accusatory slide show. I've been reading various accounts of battered and traumatised survivors congregating in what is left of the streets of Port-au-Prince to sing and pray through the night to God and the Lwa. Maintaining their faith in the face of an apocalyptic event.
Language is insufficient. Blog writing is inappropriate. Chatty mouth doesn't get people out from under buildings.
Aside from donating, praying and setting lights, I thought I could at least collate some relevant URLs and offer a perspective on some of the stone cold evil commentary that I've seen in the media recently.
First and foremost, here is a list of information and resources for helping Haiti, collated by a friend of mine. Doctors without borders seems to get a lot of praise for their work. Partners in health gets a recommendation from Régine Chassagne of Arcade Fire, who has written a great article in today's Guardian (which unfortunately contains some truly callous and despicable sub-human entries in the comments field). And Waxidermy (home of "weird records that suck") are running a series of charity auctions of rare and collectable vinyl with all proceeds going to Haiti.
Also in the Guardian today is the collected twitter entries covering the earthquake and its immediate aftermath from Richard Morse, hotelier in Port-au-Prince and musician in the band RAM. Hearteningly, the 5:45 entry on Tuesday tells us that Morse's mother – the singer and folklorist Emerantes de Pradines Morse – has survived the disaster. I have previously blogged about her 1953 record Voodoo, recorded under her maiden name Emy de Pradines.
Throughout the week, the Wild Hunt blog has contributed some excellent commentary and collation of the various eye-bleed diatribes about Haitian Vodou that have been doing the rounds in the media. And there has been a bit of discussion of similar issues over on Liminal Nation and Enfolding, Phil Hine's new blog.
It's all just the same old predictable shit really. New Orleans was on the receiving end of similar victim blaming in the aftermath of Katrina. There always seems to be someone out there whose first impulse to images of catastrophic loss of human life is to warp it into something that bolsters their own paranoid political, religious or occult narrative.
Former presidential candidate and apparent worshipper of the Gnostic demiurge, Pat Robertson, got the ball rolling early on this week by informing his audience:
“Something happened in Haiti a long time ago that people may not want to talk about… They were under the heel of the French. You know, Napoleon III, or whatever. And they got together and swore a pact to the devil. They said, we will serve you if you'll get us free from the French. True story. And so, the devil said, okay it's a deal."
There's not too much to say about this that hasn't already been said elsewhere, but it's surprising how little attention the "You know, Napolean III, or whatever" line has received. The Haitian Revolution took place between 1791 and 1803, and Napolean III was made President of France in 1848. Yet somehow Mr Robertson can still gaze emphatically into the camera and assert that he is telling us a "true story". What the fuck, Pat? What the fuck?
This bollocks about a pact with the devil has its roots in the Haitian folk tale of Bois Caiman, that tells of a Vodou ceremony that took place at that location on the eve of the Haitian revolution, led by a Houngan called Dutty Boukman and attended by Voudoissants from all over Haiti. According to the tale, a pig was sacrificed to the Lwa Erzulie Dantor, and a vow was made to overthrow the French slavers and free the people from their subjugation. It is a popular folk tale of Haitian independence.
What I find interesting is the way even those involved in debunking Robertson's bile, often still seem to portray this event as a Faustian pact of sorts. A contract entered into with shadowy powers where a pig is sacrificed in order to ensure a certain outcome. However, a basic grasp of Vodou will tell you that the Lwa are fundamentally understood as ancestral spirits. Erzulie Dantor herself is a fierce protective mother goddess often envisioned as a single mother who will do anything to look after her children when they are in danger. The ceremony at Bois Caiman is therefore best understood as an appeal to the ancestral powers for protection, ahead of the Haitians entering a conflict where they were vastly outgunned.
It wasn't a compassionless contract or business deal with an infernal power, it was calling on the extended spiritual family for support in a time of crisis. The sacrificed pig wasn't payment for services rendered, it was dinner. Erzulie Dantor regularly receives a pig as part of her service, which is then cooked and shared by the community of celebrants. This is not a one-off thing that happened once in the 18th century, it is a regular aspect of Vodou practice which takes place in a context where participants rear and slaughter their own livestock. They would ultimately be killing the pig (or chicken or goat, etc) in order to eat anyway. The dedication of the animal to the Divine beforehand is a way of making the act sacred and having respect for the life that is to be taken so that the community can eat. Interpreting such an offering in terms of a lurid Satanic sacrifice like something from the Hammer House of Horror is akin to portraying the sanctification of Halal meat in a similar light.
Nothing is taking place in Robertson's comments other than the racist portrayal of African ancestor-based traditional religions as a source of evil. The only real difference between the ceremony at Bois Caiman, and a Christian soldier attending church and praying before going off to war, is that the latter employs the services of an abattoir and only has to worry about buttering the bread and preparing the ham sandwiches for the buffet after the service.
It's also worth pointing out that the Bois Caiman story is a folk tale, and as per folk tales, it may not have literally happened. It is perhaps best thought of as analogous to our traditions about Robin Hood.
Later on, cheeky cheery R*sh L*mbaugh waded into the debate, telling us that the disaster was "made to order" for President Obama, as it would allow him to "burnish his credibility … with both light-skinned and black-skinned" African Americans.
I don't even know what that means. "Both light-skinned and black-skinned"?!? Who says things like that? I know I shouldn't be surprised by these nutjobs, but, just, fucking hell...
Keith Olbermann brings the fight to them here:
One unpleasant pattern that I've observed this week is how a right wing talking head will say something disgusting that uses the deaths of thousands as political ammunition. Then someone more liberally-minded will pipe up and rightly call them on it, and the right wing response will be to accuse their liberal interlocutor of using the deaths of thousands as political ammunition themselves because they are stepping up and challenging these inflammatory statements. I fear it is a conspiracy to take all voices of opposition off the board due to self-inflicted desk-related head injuries.
According to wikipedia, the planet sees an average of 18 earthquakes per year on the Richter scale of 7.0-7.9. This appears to support the notion that it's the nation's poverty, vulnerability and lack of infrastructure that has made the impact of this earthquake so catastrophic. Similarly, the hurricanes that devastated parts of Haiti a few years back caused such levels of destruction specifically because of the widescale deforestation that has vastly reduced the once heavily forested landscape that previously provided a natural protection against storm damage. Comparatively, it was the destruction of the once plentiful wetlands around New Orleans, directly caused by excess drilling for oil, that left the city so vulnerable to the ravages of Hurricane Katrina. In addition, a recent US court ruling found that poor maintenance of a navigation channel by the Army Corps of Engineers was responsible for ruptures in the levee that caused much of the worst flooding in the city. The barriers should have been able to stand a hurricane of that force, but money that should have gone towards maintenance was allegedly skimmed off due to the endemic corruption of local politics.
None of these facts really point towards a supernatural cause belying the natural disasters that Haiti and New Orleans have endured. I'm a strong believer that "The Devil" only really exists as a personification of the horrors that human beings perpetrate upon one another and upon the planet. Such as slavery, for instance. Or being so abjectly terrified of a free black territory that has violently thrown off the yoke of slave owners, that you conspire to undermine its economy and stability in such a way that the repercussions are still being felt centuries later.
My grasp of Haitian history is fairly superficial, but I understand that the emergent nation was forced to pay 150 million francs of war reparations to France in the early 1800s, an amount that would translate into tens of billions today. The west believed that Haiti needed to be taught a lesson, lest other slave colonies might follow it's example and rise up in bloody revolution. It seems unrealistic to my mind that powerful western nations would *not* use everything at their disposal to punish a country that attempted to exist so far outside of their global hegemony in this way; and that seems to be largely what happened. It took the country over 150 years to pay these reparations, severely depleting its natural resources to do so. Haiti was forced into this arrangement – essentially remunerating slave owners for the loss of revenue incurred by their freedom – in order to finally be recognised as a valid entity. For the preceding 60 years before the reparations were agreed to, not a single nation on the planet had recognised Haiti's independence following its revolution. I'd hazard that a line can perhaps be drawn between these concerted efforts at undermining Haiti throughout it's early history, and its current position as the poorest nation in the western hemisphere. It's not fucking rocket science is it. I've seen many commentators describe Haiti as a "failed state" this week, but did it really have much of a chance to be anything else, given how it came into being and the forces ranged against it?
Certainly these factors seem a more convincing reason for why this earthquake has had such a dreadful impact, than the fuck-witted explanation of a Voodoo curse that irrational minds seem to leap towards. If you make an effort to understand Haitian Vodou, as opposed to uncritically soaking up its hollywood caricature, it becomes clear that it is community building and empowering for its participants. It was, after all, the religion that brought together enslaved peoples from all regions of Africa and galvanised them into a force capable of accomplishing the only successful slave revolution in modern history. It's difficult to think of another world religion that has been demonised to the extent of the African traditional religions, and there is a convincing argument that the sheer terror which the success of the Haitian revolution evoked in slave-holding nations is one of the key drivers of that othering process.
Here is a link to an article I wrote a couple of years ago called 'Live and Let Die – fears and misconceptions about Vodou'. It's a response that I drafted the last time I had to deal with a pair of eedjits harbouring stupid racists ideas about African traditions, previously published on the now inactive Key 64 (thanks to Nick Pell for digging out the lost text for me), and now very kindly hosted at short notice by Phil Hine over on his website.
Even (comparatively) respectable news coverage of the disaster in Haiti can't seem to help dropping in a bit of lurid Voodoo-bashing to spice up its copy. For instance, the Evening Standard (London's evening paper) ran a box-out last week on the corruption and unstable infrastructure of Haiti that will exacerbate the current situation, and couldn't help but make the observation that "Voodoo, involving black magic and animal sacrifice, is recognised as an official religion in Haiti". What bearing on the issue does that have exactly? Why would you mention this unless you were attempting to make some spurious connection between the religious lives of Haitians and the disaster? If there was an earthquake in Japan, it would be unlikely that a newspaper would make any reference to the equally animist Shinto traditions of that island. When the Indian Ocean tsunami hit in 2004, I don't recall seeing much coverage of the broadly comparable animist traditions of Indonesia and Sri Lanka. Fuckers can't resist an opportunity to leer at African spirituality and depict it as ignorant savagery, without actually bothering to try and understand it before splurging out inane copy.
Lastly, here's an interesting perspective on the earthquake from a Haitian Vodou practitioner who perceives the disaster as nature rebalancing itself after decades of deforestation and environmental destruction, "like a horse throwing a rough rider".
However you may frame the event, the important things right now are donating money to the aid organisations that are doing good work on the ground, and expressing unequivocal support and solidarity for those that have been affected and their family members. Slapping down pernicious hatemongers wherever they rear their heads is a secondary pursuit, but that's good too.
Here's Richard Morse's group RAM doing their track "Fey", meaning "faith":
And Arcade Fire's track Haiti with lovely footage shot on location:










